[ CancerWeb Home
| Comments
| CancerWeb Report Index ]
Editor's Comment: - Normal adenoviruses knock out the p53 system when they infect cells, so releasing the switch which prevents cells from entering the active proliferation cycle. The resulting division of cells with active viral growth inside, followed by their bursting (lysis), facilitates the spread of the infection. A viral mutant that can only grow in cells lacking p53, as do about 50% of human cancers, can have great specificity of action. As discussed by the authors of the paper, there are questions that need to be resolved before the technique can be applied in practice. The immune reaction of a person given the virus is not known, and this problem cannot be studied in animals which are not subject to infection by human adenoviruses. It is possible, however, that a virally-infected tumor might be a more provocative target for the immune system than the uninfected tumor, so the p53 effect might conceivably be enhanced. Intra tumoral injection as used in this study is not feasible in humans, since most tumors are not easily accessible. Early Phase I clinical trials of the mutant virus are underway in patients with head and neck cancers deficient in p53 at the University of Texas in San Antonio (Dr. Von Hoff) and the Beatson Institute, Glasgow, Scotland (Dr. Kaye)
Editors's Comment: - Although this study confirms generally-held beliefs, and agrees with data from the US and elsewhere, there is a gap in the study that undermines its value. The study did not include information on the health status (comorbidity) of the cancer patients. Were there legitimate grounds to judge the more elderly as being too frail for surgery or toxic chemotherapy combinations? Many recent studies suggest that age alone is not a decisive factor in choosing treatments. Elderly persons in good health may be as capable of tolerating stressful therapies as much younger individuals.
Editor's Comment: - The researchers speculated at length on the mechanisms responsible for the carcinogenic effect, since phenolphthalein seems to produce a unique mix of tumors. Estrogen-like activity did not appear to be responsible. The doses used are cumulatively much higher than the average person would take intermittently in the course of treating constipation, but it should be remembered that in other work the abnormal red cells were seen in animals receiving only the equivalent of twice the human dose. The discussion focussed on the ovarian tumors, and a study is underway to see if there is a relationship between phenolphthalein use and ovarian cancer in humans.
