Post-operative radiation for lung cancer, still doubt whether it
is of significant benefit - Four randomized trials of post-operative
radiotherapy in patients treated surgically for non-small-cell lung
cancer have failed to demonstrate benefit;
another trial by the European Organization for Research and
Treatment of Cancer showed significant benefit (70% versus 50% 3-year
survival). These trials have generally lacked sufficient
size for statistical demonstration of improved survival, and too
many patients were excluded from the final analysis. The issue
is important, due to the widespread occurrence and seriousness of
this disease, and because patients should never be subjected to
ineffective treatment. A sixth study of 308 patients from 16
centers in the UK, coordinated by the Medical Research Council,
was published in the August issue of the British Journal of
Cancer. It failed to find any evidence for benefit from
radiotherapy in patients with disease staged as N1 (metastases to
lymph nodes around the bronchial area). For those staged as N2
(with metastases to the lymph nodes in the central back area -
the mediastinum), addition of radiotherapy produced clinically
significant reduction in metastases, but longer follow-up will be
needed to determine whether the apparent increase of about one
month in survival time for these patients holds up. (Stephens,
Brit J Cancer 74:632, 1996)
Editor's Comment: - Unfortunately, although the results of this
trial are suggestive, the number of patients was not sufficient
to provide statistical proof of improved survival in the various
subgroups. Several thousand patients would be required for this.
It is also possible, as discussed in an editorial on the subject
in the same journal issue, that the radiation dose or schedule
needs adjustment in future studies for improved efficacy.