Is PSA a good indicator of response to therapy? - Reliance on PSA
measurements, originally a diagnostic indicator, as a surrogate
for response of prostate cancer to therapy is now widespread, but
is it always justified? A preclinical study involving treatment
with the drug suramin of mice with two different strains of
prostate cancer, one dependent on androgens and the other non-
responsive to androgens, sounds a note of caution. Researchers
from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston found that
suramin only inhibited the growth of the androgen-dependent tumor
despite the fact that it decreased the expression of the PSA gene
and serum PSA levels in animals bearing both tumor lines. PSA
levels should be interpreted cautiously in studies of drug
therapy that does not affect androgen-dependent disease.
(Thalmann, J Natl Cancer Inst 88:794, 1996)
Editor's Comment: - As a footnote to this report, results
presented at the ASCO Meeting, and discussed in the "News"
section of the same June 19, 1996 issue of the Journal of the National
Cancer Institute (page 791), give some idea of how low PSA levels
should fall in treated patients to give some prognostic
implications. Whereas 10 years after PSA had fallen to 0.5 ng/mL
or less, 84% were still disease-free, only 29% of those whose
lowest levels were 0.5 ng/mL and above were disease-free at 5-
years, and tumor recurred in all whose levels never fell below 1
ng/mL.